NIH Says Bat Research Group Failed to Submit Rapid Virus Results – .

NIH Says Bat Research Group Failed to Submit Rapid Virus Results – .

The dossier was submitted late, the NIH said, nearly two years after the specified 120-day deadline from the completion of the work. “The delayed reporting is a violation of the terms and conditions of the NIH grant award,” said Renate Myles, a spokesperson for the agency.

Jesse Bloom, a virologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center who called for more research into the origins of the pandemic, said the revelations raised serious questions about the risks of investigating viruses from animals, called zoonotic viruses.

“In my opinion, some of this research on potential pandemic pathogens poses unacceptable risks,” he said. “In addition to asking if EcoHealth has adhered to current regulations, we need to honestly ask what research should be done in the future to best minimize zoonotic and laboratory-associated pandemic risks. “

And Michael Imperiale, a virologist at the University of Michigan, said the NIH letter raised questions about how the agency assessed potentially dangerous research and shared it with the public – a need critics have been pointing to for years. . “First and foremost, I think this again underscores the need for transparency in how the NIH looks at these experiences,” he said.

Some Congressional Republicans have been asking for more information for months, suggesting research was the source of the pandemic. In a statement, Representative Comer asserted that “thanks to the hard work of Republicans on the Oversight Committee, we now know that US taxpayers’ money funded research into the gain of duty at the Wuhan lab.”

Dr. Tabak’s letter did not include any mention of “gain in office” research.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here