3 plausible Maple Leafs lineups that fit under the cap – .

0
8
3 plausible Maple Leafs lineups that fit under the cap – .


Preseason has only just started and there are choices to be made on the Leafs roster, but there isn’t much flexibility in terms of ceiling space. Auston Matthews is expected to be fully recovered from surgery in time to start the season; the goalkeeper is defined; the top six defense is a given – barring serious injuries, there will be no LTIR on Open Day.

Right now, Alex Steeves, Joe Woll, and Ian Scott are all injured in one way or another. Because all three have two-pronged contracts and didn’t play in the NHL last year, they can, if they’re still injured, start the year in the season-opening Injury Reserve. . In their case, they will not count towards the cap. EVENING is not the same as LTIR, so there is no pool to process.

Conservative list number one

Assuming everyone is available and healthy, the more conservative list, judged almost entirely by contracts – as in, players paid above the minimum expect to make the squad – is under the cap, set again at $ 81.5 million this season.

Nick Ritchie – Auston Matthews – Mitch Marner
Michael Bunting – John Tavares – William Nylander
Ilya Mikheyev – Alexandre Kerfoot – Ondrej Kase
Wayne Simmonds – David Kämpf – Jason Spezza
Pierre Envall

Jake Muzzin – Justin Holl
Morgan Rielly – TJ Brodie
Rasmus Sandin – Travis Dermott

Petr Mrázek
Jack Campbell

With this group of 21, the ceiling space is $ 80,217. Barring a major trade, there’s really no way to get more than 21 players on the roster. Don’t worry too much about the line assignment of the different wingers, it is unlikely to stay static. This structure requires the following players to clear waivers:

  • Kurtis Gabriel
  • Joey Anderson
  • Michel Amadio
  • Brett Seney
  • Adam Brooks
  • Alex court
  • Carl Dahlström
  • Brennan Menell
  • Teemu Kivihalme
  • Michel Hutchinson

Josh Ho-Sang and Nikita Gusev, who are expected to either sign a contract with the NHL, are also reportedly demanding waivers be awarded to the AHL.

Seven defenders

The first question to ask about the obvious roster above – and it’s so obvious is the one Cap Friendly has as a projected roster – is what has happened to the tradition of playing with an extra defender, not a attacker. This was Mike Babcock’s preference, but even he was flexible when circumstances called for it. If the Leafs wanted to do that, say for a road trip when one of their defenders was a little bit affected, they would have to pick a forward and put them on waivers.

It is at this point that Pierre Engvall seems both useful, in that he plays center or wing, and expendable, in that he does not add as much to the results of the game as almost everything. the world. Let’s say the Leafs decide to risk losing him on waivers and cutting him for a defenseman:

Nick Ritchie – Auston Matthews – Mitch Marner
Michael Bunting – John Tavares – William Nylander
Ilya Mikheyev – Alexandre Kerfoot – Ondrej Kase
Wayne Simmonds – David Kämpf – Jason Spezza

Jake Muzzin – Justin Holl
Morgan Rielly – TJ Brodie
Rasmus Sandin – Travis Dermott
Brennan Menell

Guardians unchanged

This provides a ceiling space of $ 455,217, which will add up much faster. It’s important this season because the Olympic break created a 200-day NHL season. Since cap space accumulates day by day, the amount each day is less and it takes longer to build up enough for an ill-advised due date transaction.

Cutting Engvall assumes the Leafs signed Wayne Simmonds for two years at $ 900,000 because they intend to play him, and they’re not interested in our analysis on the wisdom of that. An argument can be made that Simmonds’ extra year on his contract makes him free from de facto waiver because no one would claim him. It’s possible the Leafs were looking to secure, with his contract, a player who could move from AHL on paper to NHL roster if need be, carefully using his 30-day exemption after he cleared the first time.

If they cut Simmonds, keep Engvall, and add Menell, the ceiling space is now $ 230,217.

Play Kidz!

You want to play leads, not a guy like Simmonds. I made the list I’m closest to that puts Nick Robertson and Timothy Liljegren on the team:

Nick Ritchie – Auston Matthews – Mitch Marner
Michael Bunting – John Tavares – William Nylander
Ilya Mikheyev – Alexandre Kerfoot – Ondrej Kase
Nick Robertson – David Kämpf – Jason Spezza

Jake Muzzin – Justin Holl
Morgan Rielly – TJ Brodie
Rasmus Sandin – Timothy Liljegren
Travis Dermott

Guardians unchanged

The ceiling space on this listing is $ 445,217. Liljegren carries performance bonuses on his contract up to $ 400,000. It only matters if the team is operating in LTIR and they are the player added to use the LTIR pool. In this case, his potential bonuses count for the pool. In a normal situation operating below the cap of the cap, it is irrelevant unless he wins them. Even then, they’re not a problem until the end of the year, and the worst that can happen is that $ 400,000 could be paid out next year if the Leafs use up all of their cap space this year. It is not an issue important enough to influence decision making. If he’s a better player than the other players, I think the Leafs will play him.

This list also contains three players exempt from exemptions, which allows much more flexibility than the other two ideas above. If Robertson and Liljegren were really ready, that would be ideal. I think the likelihood of this happening is extremely low.

Engvall and waivers

Two players really stand out by having contracts far superior to those offered by Jason Spezza, while not really adding much value – at least in terms of goals scored. They are $ 1.25 million Engvall and $ 1.5 million David Kämpf. Unless Kämpf plays the role of 3C on merit and makes this whole list-building process more complex than it seems right now, he, like Engvall, is being overpaid for his minutes.

Still, the Leafs came out and got Kämpf, outbidding the other teams. He would really need to fizzle out at training camp to not be part of the roster’s opening night. Engvall, on the other hand, hasn’t been the first choice to play so far. He didn’t play opening night of the playoffs and he only played 42 regular season games. Simmonds, for all his injuries, has played 38.

At the same time, neither player would erase the waivers. They are both clearly capable NHL players, and there are teams for whom a little overpayment is a good thing this season.

If Engvall’s role in the First List Concept is to sit in the press box most nights, then that’s the job Adam Brooks was willing to do, and he paid a lot. less. If the 13th attacker is the one who will pivot in the lineup as the various wingers move around the lines until the ultimate setup is found, then it is possible to justify the limited space on the first. alignment. If not, make a decision, accept that Joey Anderson, Brooks, Robertson, etc. be there to replace and relocate Engvall.

I don’t believe Robertson or Liljegren will be on the team. And the first list is good – or until the first injury presents itself – but it’s really hard to imagine working for 82 games without the “chance” of having someone dear on LTIR to provide the flexibility that it lacks.

It’s still early days and we haven’t even seen Kämpf and Kaše yet, but I can hardly imagine that the 21 names on that first list will even be the Maple Leafs on October 12.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here