The Court of Appeal decides that the children must be returned to their mother in France after the father has requested stay in Ireland – fr

0
11
The Court of Appeal decides that the children must be returned to their mother in France after the father has requested stay in Ireland – fr


THE COURT OF APPEAL upheld a ruling that two children, whose Irish father refused to allow them to return to their mother’s in France due to the compulsory wearing of masks in French schools, must be sent home.

The court heard that the two children were born in France, where they normally reside, to an Irish father and a French mother.

The children, two boys who are both in primary school and their parents cannot be named for legal reasons.

Their parents separated and their father returned to Ireland.

Last year, while the children were visiting Ireland, their father decided he would not return them to their mother.

This was due to concerns he had about one of his sons having to wear a face mask, as part of efforts to counter the Covid-19 pandemic, while attending school in France .

While he did not want them to stay in Ireland permanently, the boy’s father argued that being required to wear masks would harm his son and cause him to suffer from anxiety and distress.

Following the father’s refusal to allow them to return their mother to France, the French courts filed a petition under the International Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Kidnapping, commonly known as the Hague Convention.

In a judgment rendered earlier this year, Judge Mary Rose Gearty High Court dismissed the father’s claims.

She ruled that the two children had been wrongly detained and should be returned immediately to France.

The decision was appealed by the father, who said he was seeking a stay until the order requiring Frech schoolchildren aged 6 and older to wear masks at school was lifting.

In his judgment, the three judges of the Court composed of Madam Justice Mary Faherty, Justice Maurice Collins and Madam Justice Teresa Pilkington dismissed all of the father’s grounds of appeal.

# Open journalism
No news is bad news
Support the newspaper

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support us now

Giving the court decision, Justice Collins said the evidence presented to the court was grossly insufficient to establish serious risk or harm to any of the children.

There was no plausible or significant evidence that the requirement to wear a face mask in school will have a negative impact on the child, the judge said.

He added that it was not disputed that the evidence required to order the return of the children under Article 12 of the Hague Convention had been satisfied.

The court heard that the boys’ parents had been in a relationship for some time and resided together in France.

When the relationship ended, the Irish father returned and the children resided with their mother in France. By arrangement, the children traveled to Ireland at the end of last year.

However, their father decided not to return them after announcing in October 2020 that wearing a mask would become mandatory for all children aged 6 and over.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here