Prince Harry responds to bomb investigation in interview with Diana – fr

Prince Harry responds to bomb investigation in interview with Diana – fr

Princes Harry and William have responded to the explosive findings of an independent investigation into the BBC’s infamous 1995 Panorama interview with their mother, Princess Diana.

The investigation centered on British journalist Martin Bashir and his use of fake bank documents to secure access to the princess during the now iconic shoot, in which Diana claimed “we were three married.” Bashir, who was the company’s religion editor until last week, abruptly resigned from the company on May 14, citing poor health.

The findings of the inquiry, led by retired judge Lord Dyson, revealed on Thursday that the BBC “failed to meet the high standards of integrity and transparency that are its hallmark” and that the inquiry The then intern, headed by former BBC director General Tony Hall, was “woefully ineffective”.

Reacting to the findings, Prince Harry said: “Our mother was an incredible woman who dedicated her life to service. She was resilient, courageous and unquestionably honest. The ripple effect of a culture of exploitation and unethical practices ultimately cost him his life.

“To those who have taken on some form of responsibility, thank you for owning it,” the Duke of Sussex continued. “This is the first step towards justice and truth. Yet what deeply concerns me is that such practices – and even worse – are still prevalent today. In the past, and now, it’s bigger than a point of sale, a network or a publication.

“Our mother lost her life because of it, and nothing has changed. By protecting her heritage, we are protecting everyone and respecting the dignity with which she has lived her life. Let us remember who she was and what she stood for.

Prince William, who is second to the throne, simultaneously released his own recorded statement in response to the inquiry, using significantly stronger language than his brother to hold the public broadcaster to account.

“I am of the opinion that the misleading manner in which the interview was obtained significantly influenced what my mother said,” the Duke of Cambridge said.

“The interview was a major contribution to the worsening of my parents’ relationship, and has since hurt countless others. It brings an indescribable sadness to know that the failures of the BBC have contributed significantly to her fear, paranoia and isolation that I remember the last few years with her.

Prince Harry recently castigated paparazzi culture and the intense media scrutiny of his life with his wife Meghan Markle in an interview with Dax Shepard and Monica Padman’s ‘Armchair Expert’ podcast.

The BBC has contacted the princes to apologize for its shortcomings in investigating Bashir’s methods of securing the Panorama interview. The release of the 127-page survey results is seen as a major stain on the BBC’s reputation, and some have compared it to the company’s version of the News of the World phone hacking scandal.

Dyson has indeed suggested that the BBC tried to cover up the findings of its internal investigation into Bashir 25 years ago. “I also concluded that, without justification, the BBC concealed in its newspapers facts which it had been able to establish about the manner in which Mr Bashir had obtained the interview; and did not mention the problem at all in any news program and therefore did not meet the high standards of integrity and transparency that are its hallmark, ”Dyson wrote.

Calling the independent report “thorough and comprehensive”, chief executive Tim Davie said in a statement the company “fully accepts Lord Dyson’s findings”.

“Although the report states that Diana, Princess of Wales, was enthusiastic about an interview with the BBC, it is clear that the process of getting the interview was far from what the public was entitled to. ‘expect. We are very sorry about that. Lord Dyson identified obvious shortcomings, ”Davie said.

“While the BBC today has significantly better processes and procedures, the ones that existed at the time should have prevented the interview from being secured in this way. The BBC should have done more to get to the bottom of what happened at the time and be more transparent about what it knew. Although the BBC cannot turn back the clock after a quarter of a century, we can offer a full and unconditional apology. The BBC is offering this today. “


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here