Knowing Paddington, he would probably just nod and treat himself to a more delicious marmalade, but we are ready to fight with closed fists in defense of this little Peruvian darling and her even smaller coat. It was our first reaction, anyway, to find out that Paddington 2 lost its perfect score of 100% Rotten Tomatoes, three and a half years after the film was first theatrically released in the UK, after the site took in a low-praise review.
According to Hollywood journalist, Paddington 2Its critical score slipped to a meager 99% with the addition of a review from Film Authority’s Eddie Harrison. Interesting way, Citizen Kane also lost its 100% rating last month following the discovery of a negative review from 1941. This change inspired debate, as it placed Paddington 2 at the peak of cinematic achievement (or, at the very least, at the top of the heap of highly rated films) so far.
” I saw again Paddington 2 negatively for BBC radio when it was released in 2017, and on several occasions thereafter, and I stand by every word of my criticism, ”writes Harrison, by THR. And in case you were thinking, “Okay, so he gave Paddington 2 a B- or something like that. It’s not so bad ”, in the great tradition of the great critic Jay Sherman, he thinks indeed Paddington 2 may
“Paddington is voiced by Ben Wishaw and sounds like a member of an indie-pop group coming down from an excruciating ketamine state, and that’s just the start of what’s wrong with the Paul King movie” , he writes, finding the film version of Paddington “too confident, devious and brooding,” to name a few flaws. Says Harrison, “This is not my Paddington bear, but a sinister and malicious impostor who should be shot in space or nuclear.” from space at the first opportunity. How dare you… actually you know what? If “Paddington gets shot in space” isn’t perfect Paddington 3 plot, we will eat his little hat. Hey it worked for F9.