Details of the proposed incentive emerged when Boris Johnson told MPs he believes homeowners should be able to set entry criteria for their establishments.
Johnson’s comments, a much stronger endorsement of the widespread use of Covid certification than had previously been done by the Prime Minister, prompted an immediate backlash from some Tory MPs, who called it ‘a dangerous path “.
Johnson said he believes the Covid certification has the support of the British people who understand the need for protective measures, and suggested he supports wider use of vaccine passports, which a committee led by Michael Gove is investigating currently.
The government’s review of social distancing measures, due to be reported in June, is currently examining the possibility of allowing sites that require Covid status on entry – which includes a recent test or vaccine proof – relax all social distancing rules.
This move would mean that many pubs could operate much more profitably and would likely entice citizens to get vaccinated or get tested.
A Whitehall source pointed out that the consultation was in its early stages and no decision had been made, but said it was a step being considered as part of the orderly social distancing review by Johnson when he laid out the roadmap for easing restrictions. A separate exam also examines how Covid certification might work in practice.
The certification consultation aims to determine whether an NHS app could be changed to allow people to show whether they had been recently tested or vaccinated against Covid-19.
The PM’s comments could spark a bigger Commons rebellion in a vote Thursday to renew the coronavirus law until October – a period that some MPs say should be shortened – and put regulations on the sheet road in law.
Johnson said similar requirements were already widely used in the medical professions. “I think the basic concept of vaccine certification shouldn’t be totally foreign to us because, after all, when you’re given the care of a patient and you’re a surgeon, you’re supposed to be vaccinated against it. ‘hepatitis. B, ”he said.
“The principle is that this is a particularly contagious disease. It can be really, really nasty. We have seen what has happened in nursing homes as we discussed earlier. It does not strike me as irresponsible at all of the retirement home companies to consider requiring vaccinations. ”
Johnson said he was pleased that pubs insisted on vaccine passports so he could enter. “I think that’s the kind of thing that can belong to individual tax collectors,” he said. “I find myself in this long national conversation thinking about it very deeply and I think the audience is thinking about it very deeply.
“And I feel like there is tremendous wisdom in the public sentiment on this and people instinctively recognize when something is dangerous and they can see that Covid collectively is a threat, and they want us to as their government and I as prime minister take whatever steps I can to protect them. ”
Tory MP William Wragg, who was interviewing Johnson at the Liaison Committee, said he couldn’t imagine the Prime Minister supporting “in a past life” certification as a columnist for the Daily Telegraph.
Steve Baker, Conservative vice-chair of the Covid Recovery Group of MPs with skeptical lockouts, said it was deeply concerning.
“Whether the state legislates for it, recommends it or just allows it, the result will be the same,” he said.
“A two-tiered Britain that prevents pregnant women from participating in society, as the government tells them not to get vaccinated, or a Britain where we go back in time and tolerate companies hijacking clients from communities who have shown reluctance to accept the vaccine offer. We must not fall into this horrible trap.
Johnson reported in his testimony that the dates set in his roadmap – for a gradual easing of lockdown restrictions on April 12, May 17 and June 21 – were still on track and had not been disrupted by the reopening schools in England early. Of March.
“There is no sign in the data that makes me believe, at this point, that we are going to have to deviate from this roadmap to freedom,” he said.
Baker, who said he would likely vote against renewing the coronavirus law on Thursday, said it was “a rare opportunity for MPs to say no to a new way of life in a checkpoint society. , under extreme police powers, that we would. not recognized at the beginning of last year ”.
He plans to table an amendment to revoke some of the powers of the police provided for in Article 21 of the law, in particular to take action against “potentially infectious” people.
Baker said powers “which have a 100% illegal prosecution record should be viewed as” redundant “to say the least.
A number of MPs have also pressed Johnson for an investigation into the pandemic. Asked about the mistakes he made in the first few weeks, he said: “I think there are all kinds of things I’m looking back on and I wonder if we could have done differently. I wouldn’t want to make my biggest mistake and pick the wrong one.
“We didn’t have the effect of the asymptomatic transmission that fueled the nursing home epidemic. We learn all the time and what we want is proper investigation.
Johnson also said he would like the investigation to examine how the message works in each of the decentralized countries, which often had different rules and restrictions at different times.
“I think there will be a point where we can look back and assess how the message worked and the impact of how we did it and that will be one of the things that I know that we will look into the investigation, ”he said.