Bangladesh is a secular and democratic country like India and France, but the minority population who live there cannot oppose the ideology of the majority, and the same could be understood through the images that come from it. .
Apart from this, Bangladesh also witnessed large scale protests against France, and the streets of Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh, were filled with thousands of people at the call of an organization called Hifazat-e- Islam, which is a group of teachers. and students belonging to thousands of Islamic schools. These people not only staged protests, but also attempted to capture the French Embassy in Dhaka.
Two days ago, similar protests against France also took place in parts of India because the Indian constitution gave everyone the freedom to speak and protest. This report simply shows that hatred is prevalent against Hindus in a neighboring country, but it can also be misrepresented by some as an example of incitement to hatred. Those few people sitting in their living rooms can decide what is the definition of hate news?
These few people want to define “hate news” according to their whims and fancies. On October 31, as many as 95 former bureaucrats wrote to Indian businesses and corporations, asking them to stop showing advertisements on news channels that spread hate. Zee News also thinks those who spread hatred should be boycotted, but the question arises as to how these 95 people could decide that a hate report spread hate?
These 95 former senior officials have formed a group, Constitutional Conduct Group, which claims not to support any political party, and the members respect the Indian Constitution and maintain strict impartiality. Citing the Constitution, the letter said that the news stations that turned the coronavirus into a communal problem gave false news of the infiltration of Muslims during UPSC exams and raised questions such as “Love Jihad ”should not receive advertisements.
On the contrary, the real intention behind this letter can be understood in three points given below:
1. These people want to cut the financial supply of news channels so that they submit to their ideology and stop telling the truth. They want to create a situation where news channels do not pay their employees salaries and journalists should run around the courts. It’s a kind of direct threat to the news media.
2. The letter selectively cited this information to spread hatred which is in fact linked to people of a particular religion. Early letters from members of the Constitutional Conduct Group never mentioned issues such as the sadhus killings in Palghar, the terrorist attack in Pulwama, or against those who opposed the Supreme Court’s verdict on the Ram temple or their opposition to the riots in Delhi, or the demonstrations of Shaheen Bagh.
However, they characterize the opposition to Islamic fundamentalism as spreading hatred against Muslims.
3. If these officials had still been in post, would they have taken a unilateral decision. Would they have done justice to cases like the murder of Nikita Tomar in the name of Love Jihad or the death of Sushant Rahul Rajput, or the demonstration of Shaheen Bagh?
Notably, the Constitutional Leadership Group has written more than 30 letters on different issues since 2018.