Amy Coney Barrett did not disclose talks on Roe v. Wade organized by anti-abortion groups over Senate paperwork

0
121



It is not known what was said in the two events, although both focused on abortion cases. In another instance, CNN’s KFile found a high-profile talk Barrett gave to coincide with the 40th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade – a seminar Barrett revealed in his Senate documents – was withdrawn by the university from YouTube in 2014. A school spokesperson told CNN the video was now lost.

Barrett’s confirmation to the Supreme Court would bolster his current Tory majority – creating a 6-3 bloc of Tory judges – and could limit access to abortion.

Barrett’s failure to disclose the two events also raises questions about whether the questionnaire is complete or whether there will be any consequences from the Republican-led Senate Judiciary Committee, which is overseeing its confirmation hearing. Former chairmen of the powerful committee halted the nomination process after judicial candidates omitted information from their Senate documents, but under committee chairman Lindsey Graham, that scenario is unlikely.

The committee has scheduled a hearing for Barrett on Oct. 12 with the goal of confirming it by the full Senate ahead of the election.

Senate Democrats on the Judiciary Committee this week sent a letter to the Justice Department in which Barrett had omitted documents regarding Roe vs. Wade and asked if Barrett had omitted other documents after the National Review reported that Barrett signed a letter on a “right to life” announcement in 2006 that called for an end to the landmark legal ruling.

White House spokesman Judd Deere told CNN in an email: “Judge Barrett has submitted her lengthy Senate Judicial Questionnaire, has spoken to an overwhelming majority of the Senate Judiciary Committee and continues to be transparent throughout its confirmation process. She can’t wait to answer Senators’ questions next week. ”

A spokesperson for the Senate Judiciary Committee told CNN that “it is a very normal practice” for Supreme Court candidates to update their questionnaires, noting that several current Supreme Court justices have also provided updated copies.

CNN has contacted Barrett on several occasions through his law firm, but has not received a response.

While Barrett’s association with anti-abortion groups has come under scrutiny – including signing a right to life ad in 2006 – little has been scrutinized about his work. with anti-abortion groups in Notre-Dame. Barrett lectured at the anti-abortion student groups while she was also a member of the Faculty for Life at Notre Dame University, which strongly opposes abortion.

In 2016, the group sent a letter asking the university to rescind an award honored to then-vice president Joe Biden in recognition of his work as an American Catholic. The group called it a “scandalous violation of the university’s moral responsibility (as the American bishops wrote in 2004) to never honor those who act in disregard of basic moral principles about the sanctity of life” and attacked his views on abortion.

Barrett failed to disclose two seminars she gave to students on Roe v. Wade

In April 2013, Barrett gave a one hour short seminar “for students on law changes and women’s lives after Roe vs. Wade“Titled” Being a Woman after Roe. ”

According to a copy of the Facebook event announcing the seminar, seats were limited to 15 students. A student publication promoted the event as an informal, small-group seminar where students can learn about faculty members who oppose abortion.

“The Right to Life Seminar Series was launched as an opportunity for students and faculty to discuss a variety of issues related to human life and human dignity,” says an advertisement for the event. .

Democrats seek to avoid giving GOP new election year material in Supreme Court show
The conservative judge also did not reveal that in November 2013, she spoke with Jus Vitae, the right to life club at the law school, about “the Supreme Court case law on abortion. “. Law School announced the conference focusing on Roe vs. Wade and the cases that followed, including those that were pending in lower courts at the time.

The talk Barrett leaked was titled “Roe Deer at 40: The Supreme Court, Abortion, and the Culture War That Followed,” which took place in January 2013 and open to the college community. It was co-sponsored by the university’s minor in constitutional studies.

However, video of the lecture, which CNN’s KFile found on the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine was announced by the school as available on YouTube, was deleted by the user in 2014, according to a spokesperson. from YouTube.

Of 11 lectures posted as available to watch on the school event, only Barrett was removed from YouTube.

After CNN asked for a video of the event, a spokesperson for the university, Dennis K. Brown, told CNN, “We have checked with the organizer of the event. [sic] have no information on what happened to the video from this conference. ”

Several campus publications covered the event and Barrett’s remarks at the time.

The Observer, the Notre Dame student newspaper, wrote that Barrett had said: “I think it is very unlikely at this point that the court will overturn Roe deer as held back by [Planned Parenthood v.] Casey. The fundamental element, that the woman has the right to choose abortion, will probably be maintained, ”she said.

The Irish Rover, a student publication dealing with Catholic identity, quoted Barrett as saying: “Whether or not it is Roe deer is overturned is irrelevant, ”arguing that the issue of abortion would revert to the state level and may still be legal in some states.

Anti-Biden letter

While Barrett lectured on abortion to groups associated with right to life groups on campus, Barrett was also a member of the academic chapter of the University’s Faculty for Life from the group’s founding in 2010 until ‘in 2016, according to its Senate documents.

Notre Dame president faces backlash from university after Covid-19 diagnosis

While she was a member of the group, the group unanimously passed a resolution for a letter calling on the university to quash an award given to then-vice president Biden because of his beliefs about abortion.

“Our Lady claims to award the Laetare Medal” each year to an American Catholic in recognition of outstanding service to Church and society, ”the letter reads. “But our Faculty for Life chapter agrees with Bishop Kevin Rhoades that the awarding of the Laetare Medal to Vice President Biden is a scandalous violation of the moral responsibility of the University (as the American Bishops wrote in 2004) never to honor those who act with contempt. fundamental moral principles on the sanctity of life. ”

The faculty letter attacks Biden’s position on abortion for not wanting to “force” the teachings of the Catholic Church on abortion on a woman or a doctor, for supporting the death penalty and for rejecting “the truth that human life begins at conception ”. He also says officials like Biden have “a particularly serious duty to preserve” life.



LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here