The Jeffrey Epstein case may pit Alan Dershowitz against “The Good Fight” in a lawsuit – Deadline

0
46


Despite the Oscar winner The reverse of fortune made from his book of the same name, it looks like Alan Dershowitz this week must have had the difference between fact and fiction thoroughly explained by one of ViacomCBS’s top lawyers about Jeffrey Epstein.”If we understand your letter correctly, you are complaining about a line spoken by a fictional character, in an episode of the fictional series The good fightThe firm’s Jonathan Anschell wrote to Dershowitz attorney Imran Ansari on July 28 (read it here).

The company’s response follows a letter Ansari sent to apparently everyone associated with the production of The good fight – including creators Robert and Michelle King and producers Scott Free – alleged that the season finale line directed by Fred Murphy and written by Laura Marks, which aired on May 28, was defamatory and could lead to further legal action.

Beyoncé’s “Black Is King” Review: Queen Bey’s Disney + Visual Album Is Modern Mythology in Action

“You are filing this complaint on behalf of Professor Alan Dershowitz, a public figure who has long been associated with Jeffrey Epstein, and who admitted on television to having received a massage from a woman at Epstein’s mansion,” adds the deputy. Chairman and CEO and Vice Chairman of Viacom. the famous CBS All Access series. “In the non-fictional world, these factors force us to deny your request to remove the episode, and our correspondence could end here. ”

But, of course, after the bubbling letter that was sent on behalf of Dershowitz on July 17 about the dialogue in the episode “The Gang Finds Who Killed Jeffrey Epstein” Nice fightThe fourth season just ended, it doesn’t.

“In other words, as one might explain to a small child, the show, its characters and the things they say are all imaginary,” Anschell continues with a tone you can clearly hear on the page, though. you know what I mean. “People don’t watch the show to get real information about Professor Dershowitz or anyone else.


Ansari had said that “Professor Dershowitz calls on CBS to promptly remove defamatory material, cease and desist from further dissemination of defamatory material, and to issue a public apology to Professor Dershowitz,” in the letter sent by the lawyer. by Harvey Weinstein, representing Aidala, Bertuna and Kamins PC.

Literally pulling seconds of dialogue into the hour-long drama and at times bluntly wrapped up, a fictional defense lawyer played by David Alford laments with a real-life nod to series stars Christine Baranski and Audra McDonald’s for being shown to the door by Epstein in the past. “Probably around the time he left me for Dershowitz,” Benjamin Defoe tells fictional lawyers Diane Lockhart and Liz Reddick. “At least I haven’t had a massage, like this shyster. And for the purposes of any potential lawsuit, “shyster” is only my opinion and not a statement of fact. ”

“The dialogue and the context in which it takes place, with innuendo-laden words like ‘massage’, ‘Epstein’, the ‘Virgin Islands’, in combination with the word ‘shyster’, mistakenly suggests that Professor Dershowitz engaged in sexual activities. conduct, ie a “massage”, with an underage girl associated with Epstein, and is crooked, unscrupulous and lying about it, ie a “crook” “, the letter Dershowitz’s three-page lawyer said strangely.

“We are confident that no viewer would conclude that Professor Dershowitz is a con artist based on a line of opinion from a fictional character in the show, as opposed to the factual real life posts that called him exactly that. ‘ViacomCBS’ Anshell lobbied in his own letter.

And, with the sword of Damocles of the often litigation and equally media-savvy Dershowitz who took the case to court, the former Harvard Law School professor attorney representing Epstein, Weinstein and Donald Trump, returned this afternoon.

“Contrary to the position taken by CBS, the law does not allow defamation under the guise of fiction or by qualifying ‘opinion’ as libelous content,” Ansari told Deadline. “Taken as a whole and in the context presented, the defamatory insinuation of the statement is clear, and the statement, made about an individual who is far from being fictitious, amounts to little more than a gratuitous attack on my client’s professional and personal reputation. ”

First reported by Variety, news of the correspondence dust comes as real-life Epstein’s lawyer Dershowitz seeks to further extricate himself from his association with the sordid case of the now-deceased convicted sex offender who owns a private island. A dump of documents related to Epstein, who died in custody last year, and his ex-lover and tabloid offspring Ghislaine Maxwell saw Dershowitz’s name reappear in connection with the sex trafficking of young women in the orbit of the man he helped have a lover. Florida prosecutors’ agreement in 2008.

“I have requested the release of these documents,” Dershowitz said in a statement email to Deadline and other media today requesting an interview. “They do not contain any new accusations that were not made public in Guiffre’s previous lawsuits,” he added, referring to Epstein’s accuser Virginia Giuffre and the some 600 pages published Thursday evening in the irritation of U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska after Maxwell’s attorneys attempted an eleventh – one hour delay. “The reason I wanted them to be published is because they contain steaming emails and a manuscript that proves, in Guiffre’s own words, that she never met me and made up the whole story.” , Dershowitz said on Friday.

Held in New York without bond and under constant surveillance to avoid a repeat of Epstein’s disputed fate, Maxwell scored a victory on Friday when a federal judge agreed to take a break on the unsealing of the British heiress’s deposition in 2016 in the case – for the time being. .



LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here