Scott Disick’s Wikipedia search doesn’t give Kardashian fans the results they expect

0
54


Fans of the reality series keeping up with the Kardashians are well aware of the drama between Scott Disick and Kourtney Kardashian.

The whole relationship of the pair – more or less – has been documented by the series, and their ups and downs have left fans invested in what’s going on with each other – even if they can’t agree on what it should be. Some fans hope the pair will be able to fix things up once more and even hope they will add to their family with another baby. Others are convinced that it is a toxic mixture and hope that they will definitely call it.

Looking for updates on the on-off, off-again pair and their love life roller coasters could lead fans to a Wikipedia search for Disick. What they find there might surprise them.

Scott Disick and Kourtney Kardashian caught the attention of fans

Scott Disick | Sam Tabone / WireImage

Kardashian and Disick first met in 2006 at a house party in Mexico. They started dating soon after. No one could have predicted how wild (and public) the resulting relationship would be.

keeping up with the Kardashians created the following year, and Disick and Kardashian’s relationship became one of the main focal points, including a fear of early pregnancy. In 2009, the couple separated after Disick was caught texting another woman. They reconciled a few months later, and the couple welcomed their first child – a son named Mason – the same year. This major event was also captured on the show.

The ups and downs would continue to come, and Kardashian would sometimes threaten to leave Disick if he did not control his drinking. Along the way, Disick proposed to Kardashian (and was refused), and the couple welcomed a girl named Penelope in 2012.

Then, between November 2013 and January 2014, Disick lost both of his parents, and the grief seemed to trigger a new set of problems. In November 2014, Disick was in rehab but left early, and his third child – a son named Reign – was born in December.

Scott Disick and Kourtney Kardashian split makes headlines

RELATED: Scott Disick and Kourtney Kardashian ‘Always Wired’ Regularly, Fans Speculate

Although they had three children and several years together, Disick and Kardashian continued to struggle. In March 2015, he again underwent a rehab and in July of the same year, photos of him partying with young women caused a new breakup. This lasted much longer, and Disick and Kardashian were said to have been linked to other people. The couple continued to be co-parents and even went on vacation together. They seemed close enough even if they weren’t officially a couple.

In 2017, he became romantically linked to Sofia Richie, and fans collectively groaned at the couple’s huge age difference. Many predicted that the adventure would not last, but the duo found themselves in a long relationship that only ended recently.

Many blame Kardashian for the split and speculate that she and Disick are heading for another reconciliation. Disick’s loving comments do little to dampen these rumors. Most fans are only waiting for the official announcement of a restored relationship that they already suspect has taken place.

Scott Disick’s Wikipedia entry is surprising

All of this drama leaves fans with a lot of internet research to do. A Reddit fan discovered that when you searched for Scott Disick on Wikipedia, you were redirected to another entry. Instead of having his own page appear, Disick’s entry was simply linked to the “Personal Life” section of Kourtney Kardashian’s page.

Considering the pair isn’t even together anymore – and hasn’t been for years – it’s a statement about Disick’s ability to get attention on his own.

It looks like the Wikipedia entry has since been updated, and Disick does indeed have its own page now. There’s still no denying that his meager list is paler compared to the entry of his famous ex, and Kardashian still figures prominently in the description of who Disick is. Whether they like it or not, these two seem to be linked not only through the family they have built, but also through the public heritage they have left.



LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here