House judiciary chairman says he plans to subpoena attorney general

0
3


The ranking Republican on the committee, the Republic Jim Jordan of Ohio, said in a letter obtained by CNN, the New York Democrat’s staff have indicated that it may ask Barr for a hearing in July.

“Today, your staff has indicated that you intend to issue a subpoeana to the Attorney General William P. Barr to the testimony, at a hearing on July 2, 2020, “Jordan” letter to Nadler stated. “The Attorney General had already agreed to appear voluntarily in March before you canceled the hearing due to the sars coronavirus pandemic. Attorney General Barr is still willing to testify voluntarily once the pandemic enters. As a result, there is no legitimate reason for you to compel his testimony at this time. ”

The provided quote comes after a weekend of theatre on the status of the task by Geoffrey Berman, the powerful prosecutor who led the Manhattan prosecutor who pursued the President, Donald Trump and his allies. Berman said he would quit his position Saturday, ending a deadlock after Trump and Barr was fired.

Berman’s departure came a day after he had denied Barr’s request that he resign. In a brief letter to Berman on Saturday, Barr told him Trump had agreed to remove it and conceded that Berman deputy would succeed him.

Nadler told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “the State of the Union” Sunday that he thinks that the removal of Barr on the move would be a “waste of time” and instead would look to a withholding of $50 million to the Department of Justice in an effort to punish the attorney general.

“I don’t think the calls for his impeachment are premature, not more than the calls for the President’s impeachment premature, but they are a waste of time at this point,” Nadler said Tapper Barr, which he has criticized for the removal of Berman.

“We have seen a model of … Barr virus corruption impede all these studies, it is just more of the same,” Nadler said.

Nadler also called the Republican-led Senate ” corrupt “, on its decision earlier this year, in order to meet Trump on the two articles of impeachment, and he has pointed out, there is nothing to be gained from the continuation of Barr’s impeachment because it would probably be the end of the same not-guilty vote.

“We are instead going to do what we have to do without, and including the limitation of $ 50 million of its own budget and staff,” Nadler said.

In his letter, Jordan alluded to those comments, and said that they were ” unusual “.

“While the Attorney General leads the men and women of the Department of Justice, including U.S. attorneys, and the President has the unquestioned authority to remove the U.S. attorneys, you somehow interpreted Berman of the withdrawal to the evidence of a nefarious plot,” Jordan wrote. “You suggested that the Attorney General Barr was worthy of impeachment for his actions, but that you would not be dismissing him because, as you have claimed, without evidence, ‘corrupt’ Republican senators to protect it. This comment, in particular, seems to suggest that you are experiencing resentment about your embarrassing spectacle during President of Asset impeachment trial in the Senate earlier this year. ”

Nadler committee invited Berman to testify, and the president told Tapper that he is convinced that the former minister of justice going to do it, although he would not say when that may happen.

This story has been updated with new developments on Monday.

CNN Sarah Westwood, Erica Orden, Manu Raju, Evan Perez and Kara Scannell.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here