div itemprop = “articleBody”>
Chrissy Teigen Speaks Up For Alison Roman For The Second Time After Culinary Journalist Was Suspended By The New York Times After Bitter Quarrel Raised By Comments On The Model’s Success .
Mother of two, Teigen, 34, spoke out against the New York Times’ decision to remove the column from Roman, insisting that she “did not agree” with the move – and this did not believe that anyone should be ‘set aside for an honest opinion’.
“I forgave Alison very publicly and it was real,” wrote the Sports Illustrated model in a tweet.
Hits: Chrissy Teigen criticized New York Times decision to suspend culinary writer Alison Roman after denouncing the model’s success in the food industry
Hiatus: Roman, 34, was suspended earlier this week after calling Teigen’s food empire “content farm” in a controversial interview
Speaking: Teigen, 34, countered suggestions that she had anything to do with Roman’s suspension and insisted that she “would like to see him back”
“When I said I didn’t believe I was being canceled for your honesty, it was very real. I don’t agree with what the NYT did, I don’t agree with them.
Teigen then insisted that she had not participated in the suspension of Roman, 34, and would like to see her reinstated.
“I did not call them, I did not write and, above all, I would like her to come back,” she concluded.
The tweet marks the second time the cookbook author has defended Roman after being suspended, Teigen said earlier that she was “not happy with the NYT vacation.”
“I hope we can laugh about it someday,” she tweeted in response to a fan who asked her if her “beef” with Roman was over.
“But I’m not happy with the NYT vacation, so she can’t laugh about it yet.” It sucks in every way.
Roman’s suspension was first made public on Tuesday when a New York Times spokesperson told The Daily Beast that the writer’s revenue column had been suspended and was on “temporary leave “
The move came after Roman criticized Teigen and tidying up expert Marie Kondo in an interview with the New York consumer, which readers said was rude at best and racist at worst.
Opinion: This is the second time that Teigen has defended Roman, the model revealing in a previous tweet that she was “not satisfied with the NYT leave”
No further details: it is unknown whether the Roman column will permanently disappear from the Times or return when the drama ends
Roman was suspended almost two weeks after the publication of her interview, in which she described Teigen’s rise to the top of the food empire as “crazy.”
“She had a successful cookbook. And then it was like: Boom, line at Target. Boom, she now has an Instagram page with over a million subscribers, where there are only people who run a content farm for her, “said Roman.
“It horrifies me and it’s not something I want to do. I don’t aspire to that.
Roman also criticized Kondo, claiming that she sold right away by selling things online.
Not surprisingly, the reaction against Roman was swift, with social media users criticizing the writer, especially after Chrissy intervened to express his disappointment.
Roman finally apologized, but the Times apparently decided that further action was needed, making the decision to suspend her and her column in a move that sparked a furious debate on social media.
Like Teigen, many Roman fans rushed to defend him and accused the Times of overreacting – but some critics have said it was the right move.
It left a bad taste in the mouths of some who followed the drama, including the writer Natalie Shure.
Hey! Teigen is not the only one to speak up for Roman; fans also rushed to express disagreement with Times’ suspension decision
“Honestly, Alison Roman facing professional retaliation for multimillionaire celebrities speaking *** is a work problem and other NYT writers should condemn it,” Shure tweeted.
“To reiterate: what she said was undeniably crappy, and the flashback she got was justified! but to put it in a box – especially after an apology that Teigen seemed to have accepted – was too harsh and created a disturbing precedent.
Writer Luke O’Neil agreed, tweeting, “Don’t worry about the details of that, maybe she sucks, but a newspaper pulling a column because someone made beef here against one of the most famous people in the country is fu *** d up.
“I love it when an employee who has issued a public apology and taken full responsibility for her deafness in an interview is put on leave while male columnists can publish their bullshit in the newspaper and have no repercussions”, a said another fan.
“Alison Roman even apologized immediately after. Seriously, Cancel Culture is sociopathic. The crowds on the Internet on Twitter are simply the worst, “said another, while another described the Times’ decision as” crazy “.
But just like many Twitter users have said the Times made the right call, it disagreed with the premise that Roman was fired for stars who simply spoke ***.
“Should every woman of color come back AGAIN and re-explain that Alison Roman’s kitchen column in Columbus is hit because she chased two women of color and then behaved as if she were the victim, as is often the scenario when white women attack WoC? ‘Television writer Liz Hsiao Lan Alper rang the bell.
“Alison Roman has often been criticized for RENAMING ETHNIC DISHES cute names like” LA RAGOUSE “, refusing to credit the cultures whose dishes she” adapts “for the benefit of the claim of creative credit”, she continued.
Back: But others say that the problem with Roman was not to criticize a celebrity, but to choose two women of color – and they also reported problems with his column
“This problem resurfaced after being (rightly) criticized for detonating two women of color for doing business THE SAME WAY AS IT DOES BUSINESS or GOOP does business or any other prominent white chef does business.
Another wrote: “It’s more than her s *** – speaking opened a door for women of color to express concerns about the colonialist overtones in her work that have always existed but were previously unknown due to its popularity and the power of the NYT brand, though. ‘
“She attacked women of color, not” multimillionaire celebrities, “said Alisha Grauso. “It was disgusting that she chased successful women, no matter who they were. She said something stupid and mean about the producer of HER OWN SHOW and now she’s paying the price. There is nothing to condemn. ‘
After Roman’s first remarks were published, Teigen immediately expressed his grief over Roman’s comments in a series of tweets.
‘I bought [Roman’s] cookbooks, supported her on social media and praised her in interviews. I even signed on to produce the show that she talks about doing in this article, “she said.
“I really liked everything about Alison. I was jealous that she had a book with food on the cover instead of a face !! I have made countless NYT recipes that she created, posting along the way, “she continued.
“I did not” sell “by realizing my dreams. Having a line of cookware, being part of the process from start to finish, seeing something go from the sketch to my hands, I love it.
Chrissy explained that “to see [her cookbooks] to be used by people around the world does [her] so happy.’
Sad: After Roman’s initial remarks, Teigen went to Twitter to express disappointment
div class = “artSplitter mol-img-group” style = “style”>
div class = “mol-img”>
Telling the Truth: Critics May Have Hit [her] hard, “but Teigen insisted and explained that she” started the cravings because [she] wanted something for [herself] “