Mike Ashley and Newcastle have no plans to reverse their decision to leave after the Liverpool U-turn


Newcastle United would stick with its decision to lay off non-player personnel despite a turnaround from Premier League rivals Liverpool.

The Toon has become the first high-flying club to place its staff under the government’s job retention program – through which they can claim 80% of their employees’ wages up to £ 2,500 per month.

A number of other clubs have since followed suit, including Liverpool, before the Reds backed down and changed their minds after fan reaction.

But, according to the Daily Mail, Newcastle and controversial owner Mike Ashley have no plans to do the same.

Non-player staff from different Newcastle departments were put on leave last Monday.

Ashley and Newcastle have no plans to reverse their decision to lay off non-playing staff

The announcement came just days after Ashley and his company were forced to make a deplorable apology after initially trying to keep Sports Direct stores open after the government announced its lockdown plans.

They argued that stores provide an “essential service” because of the products they sell used for exercise in the home.

CFO Chris Wootton wrote, “We have a wide range of sports equipment in stock designed for exercising at home …

“In the context of gym closings, the demand for these types of products has increased exponentially as the population strives to maintain a healthy lifestyle.

“Therefore, we are uniquely positioned to help keep the UK as fit and healthy as possible during this crisis and, therefore, our Sports Direct and Evans Cycles stores will remain open as far as possible for us allow to do so (in accordance with current social conditions of government). distance orientation).

Read more

Mirror the best football stories

“There is no one else who has the range of products and the range of stores to make this reasonably accessible to all people. “

Ashley later apologized for the “poorly judged and poorly timed” decisions.

“Our intentions were only to ask the government to clarify if we should keep some of our stores open; we would never have acted against their advice, “he said.

“In retrospect, our emails to the government were poorly judged and out of sync, when they were clearly under much greater pressure than ours.

“In addition, our communications with our employees and the public on this issue were poor.

“To reiterate, I am deeply sorry for the misunderstandings of the past few days. We will learn from it and try not to make the same mistakes in the future. “


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here