Will Perdue was a solid NBA player, averaging 4.7 points per game over a 13-year career. There’s nothing wrong with this kind of production, especially when you play with Michael Jordan’s Chicago Bulls. Many players would trade places with him just for a chance at one of his four championship rings. He’s just not the kind of player you would expect to be traded for a Hall of Fame.
But on October 3, 1995, Perdue was treated directly for Dennis Rodman, who was still at his peak in terms of production. No choice of project was involved. No other player. Not even a little money. Chicago gave up a backup center and received an attacker from the third All-NBA team. In a modern NBA that regularly sees superstars traded for packages that include several young elite players and valuable draft assets, such an agreement is virtually unthinkable.
The deal was the result of the most precipitous drop in unrelated damage to business in NBA history. During the offseason of 1993, Rodman demanded an exchange for the Detroit Pistons and was transferred to the San Antonio Spurs. The return to Detroit has been substantial: 24-year-old All-Star Sean Elliott. In two years, Rodman has managed to go from being a worthy player for a young star to one who could only count on a vault. During those two years, his number was largely stable, he received numerous awards in the field and he suffered no injuries that could change his career.
So how did the Bulls hook Rodman at such a low price? Three main factors lowered Rodman’s business value, so let’s start with the obvious:
1. Rodman’s Erratic Irregular Behavior
Maybe San Antonio should have recognized the risk of negotiating for Rodman based on his behavior during his last season in Detroit. Rodman was extremely close to ex-Pistons coach Chuck Daly, whose resignation in 1992 apparently triggered a change in the defensive player of the year. Rodman skipped training camp in 1992 and was fined $ 68,000. He was suspended three games for refusing to go on a trip. But the trough undoubtedly occurred in February 1993, when he was found asleep in his truck outside the Palace in Auburn Hills with a gun. Rodman described the events in the ESPN documentary about him, “Rodman: For Better or Worse” as the beginning of a transformation.
“When I put the gun on my head, I was not trying to shoot Dennis Rodman,” he said. “I was trying to change the old one so that the new one could come out. “
The new Rodman may be best known for dating Madonna, shedding hair, and becoming one of the most notorious revelers in the NBA, but it was his behavior as a basketball player that ultimately upset the Spurs. He was fined $ 32,500 in his first season in San Antonio for four separate incidents and was suspended for a total of three games. He knocked down several opposing players, including Bull Stacey King, and things only got worse from there.
Rodman’s second season in San Antonio reads like a Mad Lib. In November, he threw an ice pack at Spurs coach Bob Hill after being ejected from an exhibition game. He split his shoulder in a motorcycle accident. He took leave from the team, was late for matches and team events, and was repeatedly suspended again. Things came to a head in the 1995 playoffs.
In the middle of the third game in the San Antonio second round series against the Los Angeles Lakers, Rodman took off his shoes and sat near the training table. He did not join the groups, choosing instead to just watch the game. Hill did not put him back on the field in Game 3, then Spurs general manager Gregg Popovich suspended him for Game 4. In his biography, “Bad as I Wanna Be”, Rodman considered the decision as approved by the whole team. .
“The players wanted to take a stand against me,” wrote Rodman. “Management wanted to take a stand against me. The whole organization wanted to send me a message. “
Rodman saw this as the moment when he knew he would not return to San Antonio. Spurs star David Robinson clearly expressed the team’s sentiment at the time.
“I want him to come back,” Robinson said. New york times. “But with the right frame of mind. “
Rodman was not in the right frame of mind, and it was the last drop. San Antonio was so fed up with his antics that he decided to trade him. But at that time, interest was practically non-existent. Its behavior was a big reason for this, but there was another driving factor in this weak market.
2. The Spurs had no leverage
The NBA knew Rodman was not long for San Antonio. The Spurs not only considered making it available in the 1995 expansion plan, but could have released it right away if the Bulls hadn’t come with an exchange, according to the Los Angeles Times. They were extremely fortunate because the Spurs simply had nowhere else to send Rodman.
The NBA never had a greater abundance of talent at the power position before the mid-1990s. Considering Rodman’s age (34 during the offseason of 1995), it stands to reason that only a competitor would be interested. It turns out that all the winning teams have been highlighted … except Chicago. In addition to the Rodman’s Spurs, nine teams finished above the Bulls in the 1994-1995 standings. Four of them had powerful attackers who made the all-star game in 1995 (Charles Barkley, Karl Malone, Shawn Kemp and Larry Johnson). Orlando had just stolen Horace Grant from the Bulls. Houston had just won a championship with Robert Horry. The Knicks (Charles Oakley), Lakers (Elden Campbell) and Pacers (Dale and Antonio Davis) all had strong veterans who were not going to be moved. San Antonio had nowhere to trade Rodman except Chicago.
And the Bulls were hardly a slam dunk. There was a big block that could have ended the deal when it started.
“Scottie [Pippen] was totally against it, “said Michael Jordan in” Rodman: For Better or Worse. “” What I understood because when he played Detroit, Scottie and he had really passionate battles. Scottie didn’t like him. “
Pippen’s problems with Rodman stemmed from a serious misconduct in the 1991 Eastern Conference final.
Rodman explained to Darnell Mayberry of The Athletic that the animosity was so severe that after the exchange ended, Bulls coach Phil Jackson forced him to apologize to Pippen. With this in mind, the Spurs had little room to negotiate. Chicago was taking a risk in the first place by bringing Rodman into the Pippen team. They weren’t going to pay San Antonio more than they had to for the privilege.
Especially considering how much they were going to have to pay Rodman to be their power attacker. Financial concerns could easily have killed the trade before it happened.
3. Rodman’s contract situation made it difficult
Rodman said in his documentary that by the time he was traded to the Bulls, he was “almost broke.” When he met Bulls executives, “All he wanted to say was how much he was going to get paid,” said Phil Jackson in his book, “Eleven Rings.” At the time, Rodman was going through a divorce and was living beyond his means despite a fairly healthy salary for the period.
In 1995 Rodman entered the last season of a long-term contract he signed as a member of the Pistons. This agreement guaranteed him a salary of $ 2.5 million. As small as it sounds by modern standards, the ceiling for the 1995-1996 season was only $ 23 million. Making about 11 percent of the salary cap, Rodman’s salary for 1995/96 would be equivalent to about $ 11.9 million today.
This posed a problem in getting a trade to work below the salary cap. How many contenders today have $ 11.9 million in wages they want to trade for as big a risk as Rodman? Any player earning almost as much as Rodman was too precious to be exchanged for a player with as little value as Rodman. So not only did the Spurs need to find a team willing to take Rodman, but they had to find one who had enough low wages to fire them so that a trade could be legally authorized. And that’s where the Bulls came in.
The Chicago frontcourt was looted in 1994 as a free agency. Starting striker Horace Grant left for Orlando. Bill Cartwright departure center has joined the Seattle SuperSonics. Scott Williams also left, so with almost no significant talent at the front, the Bulls moved to secure one of their few remaining large men. Perdue, whom they selected No. 11 overall in 1988, was in line for a bigger role, so the Bulls rewarded him with a bigger contract. Chicago awarded him a six-year contract worth more than $ 12 million. This contract was large enough to be processed directly for Rodman, and when Luc Longley became the starting center for Chicago during the 1994-95 season, Perdue became consumable.
Its expiration created another problem for potential business partners. If Rodman lived up to his promise, he would need a heavy contract extension. At 35 and given his general instability, this would have been an even greater risk than the profession. A Rodman contract that went wrong could have ruined the finances of a normal team. Fortunately, Chicago was not a normal team.
The Bulls were so incredibly profitable in the 1990s that they regularly spent well above the ceiling. Jordan alone has received salaries above the total limit in his last two seasons at Chicago. At this point, there was no maximum contract, and teams could re-sign their own players without limits thanks to Bird Rights. Jordan’s deal assured that Chicago had no aspiration to create ceiling space in the future, so they lost no flexibility in paying Rodman. He received a one-year, $ 9 million contract for the 1996/97 season, followed by a $ 4.6 million contract for the 1997/98 season. So, without major financial worries to acquire it, the Bulls decided to conclude the agreement.
Never in NBA history have the stars aligned so perfectly for a rival team to make a successful trade. In order for the Bulls to get a player of Rodman’s caliber in exchange for a save, they needed him to systematically destroy his trading value over the course of two years at a time when players in his position were numerous and few teams could afford to absorb his Contract. It was a fluke of a million that allowed the Bulls to add a third Hall of Fame to their legendary duo Jordan-Pippen, and fortunately for reasons of competitive balance, it is unlikely repeats itself.